Publication | Closed Access
Aortic input impedance in man: acute response to vasodilator drugs.
47
Citations
23
References
1981
Year
HypertensionHeart FailureCardiovascular PharmacologyImpedance ModuliCardiovascular FunctionPressure DataThrombosisAcute ResponsePublic HealthAtherosclerosisCardiologyCardiovascular ImagingVascular PharmacologyVascular BiologyPharmacologyCharacteristic ImpedanceCardiovascular DiseasePhysiologyCardiovascular PhysiologyCardiovascular PharmacodynamicsMedicine
In 18 patients who underwent coronary arteriography, aortic velocity and pressure data were obtained during a control state and during either isoproterenol infusion at 1, 2 and 3 micrograms/min or graded nitroprusside infusion (average peak dose 60 micrograms/min). Impedance moduli and phase angles were derived to 10 Hz for controls states, isoproterenol at 2 micrograms/min, and at peak nitroprusside effect. Averaged control data included a mean resistance of 1460 dyn-sec-cm-5 and a characteristic impedance of 88 dyn-sec-cm-5 The characteristic impedance did not correlate with age (r = 0.21), coronary artery disease score (r = 0.17) or mean aortic pressure (r = -0.01). In 11 patients, isoproterenol induced a 38% reduction in mean resistance and a 10% reduction in mean aortic pressure. There was slight reduction in characteristic impedance and phase angles became less negative, to 2 Hz. In seven patients, nitroprusside induced a 38% reduction in mean resistance and a 22% reduction in mean aortic pressure. Impedance moduli decreased to 1.8 Hz and phase angles became less negative, to 3 Hz. Based on the different cardiovascular actions of these two drugs, the data suggest that vasodilators do not induce significant changes in the aortic impedance spectrum when not associated with a decrease in mean aortic pressure.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1