Sensitivity of alveolar macrophages to substrate mechanical and adhesive properties

TLDR

The authors cultured alveolar macrophages on substrates ranging from ~0.1 kPa to 70 MPa—including epithelial monolayers, polyacrylamide gels, and rigid plastic or glass—and quantified shape via 3‑D F‑actin reconstructions and cytoskeletal stiffness using magnetic bead twisting. Macrophages flattened and stiffened with increasing substrate stiffness, yet did not form F‑actin stress fibers or show increased internal tension, indicating a mechanosensing mechanism distinct from tissue cells that relies on minimal actin remodeling and is captured by a numerical model of height‑dependent stiffness. © 2006 Wiley‑Liss, Inc.

Abstract

In order to understand the sensitivity of alveolar macrophages (AMs) to substrate properties, we have developed a new model of macrophages cultured on substrates of increasing Young's modulus: (i) a monolayer of alveolar epithelial cells representing the supple (˜0.1 kPa) physiological substrate, (ii) polyacrylamide gels with two concentrations of bis-acrylamide representing low and high intermediate stiffness (respectively 40 kPa and 160 kPa) and, (iii) a highly rigid surface of plastic or glass (respectively 3 MPa and 70 MPa), the two latter being or not functionalized with type I-collagen. The macrophage response was studied through their shape (characterized by 3D-reconstructions of F-actin structure) and their cytoskeletal stiffness (estimated by transient twisting of magnetic RGD-coated beads and corrected for actual bead immersion). Macrophage shape dramatically changed from rounded to flattened as substrate stiffness increased from soft ((i) and (ii)) to rigid (iii) substrates, indicating a net sensitivity of alveolar macrophages to substrate stiffness but without generating F-actin stress fibers. Macrophage stiffness was also increased by large substrate stiffness increase but this increase was not due to an increase in internal tension assessed by the negligible effect of a F-actin depolymerizing drug (cytochalasine D) on bead twisting. The mechanical sensitivity of AMs could be partly explained by an idealized numerical model describing how low cell height enhances the substrate-stiffness-dependence of the apparent (measured) AM stiffness. Altogether, these results suggest that macrophages are able to probe their physical environment but the mechanosensitive mechanism behind appears quite different from tissue cells, since it occurs at no significant cell-scale prestress, shape changes through minimal actin remodeling and finally an AMs stiffness not affected by the loss in F-actin integrity. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 2006. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.