Journal of Pelvic Medicine and Surgery · 2007 · 11 citations · 16 references
MedicineGynecologySurgeryReconstructive SurgeryReconstructive UrologyUrogenital SurgeryPelvic Floor ReconstructionPelvic Organ Prolapse SurgeryReconstructive Pelvic SurgeryVaginal Prolapse RepairVaginal ReconstructionVaginal SurgeryMesh-based Prolapse RepairMinimally Invasive Prolapse SurgeryMinimally Invasive Vaginal Prolapse RepairPelvic Floor Mesh RepairSynthetic Mesh ReconstructionSynthetic Mesh UseVaginal Mesh RepairVaginal Reconstructive Surgery
In Brief Surgical correction of pelvic organ prolapse continues to challenge the pelvic reconstructive surgeon with high rates of recurrence and reoperation. Failure rates have been cited as high as 20% to 40% after surgical repair with over 50% occurring within the first 3 years. When prolapse does recur, 60% of recurrences are at the same site. In attempts to minimize recurrence, reconstructive surgeons have turned to the use of adjuvant materials for vaginal support including the use of synthetic, allogenic, xenogenic, or autologous materials. One of the more recent developments in vaginal reconstructive surgery using synthetic mesh placement is the Prolift system (Gynecare, Somerville, NJ). In this article, we describe the surgical technique of using the Prolift system, including surgical pearls based on our experience, and present preliminary clinical outcomes. Prolift holds promise for improving the durability of pelvic reconstructive surgery, while offering a minimally invasive approach; however, more long-term data are needed before this can be stated conclusively. A description of surgical technique of using the transvaginal mesh system, Prolift, for the correction of pelvic organ prolapse. The article includes surgical pearls based on our experience and preliminary clinical outcomes.
16
Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence
Adam S. Olsen, Vincent C. Smith, Jonas Bergström et al. · Obstetrics and Gynecology · 1997 · 3.4K citations