Publication | Closed Access
Preparation and Characterization of 4,4′‐Bis(4‐aminophenoxy)diphenyl Sulfone Based Fluoropoly(ether‐imide)/Organo‐Modified Clay Nanocomposites
22
Citations
40
References
2003
Year
Materials ScienceChemical EngineeringClay MaterialsEngineeringNanocomposites FilmsClay MineralNanomaterialsPolymer Nanostructured MaterialsContact AngleClay NanocompositesOrganic ChemistryMontmorillonite ClayPolymer NanocompositesChemistryNanocompositeFunctional MaterialsOrganic-inorganic Hybrid Material
Abstract A series of fluoropoly(ether‐imide) (6F‐PEI), and [6F‐PEI/montmorillonite (MMT) clay) nanocomposites films were made by thermal curing of respective formulations containing fluoropoly(ether‐amic acid) (6F‐PEAA), synthesized from 2,2′‐bis(3,4‐dicarboxyphenyl)hexafluoropropane dianhydride (6FDA) and 4,4′‐bis(4‐aminophenoxy)diphenyl sulfone ( p ‐SED), and increasing concentration of p ‐SED treated montmorillonite clay (modified MMT clay) at temperature from RT to 350 °C. These films showed excellent solvent resistance as well as very good thermal stability, and increased glass transition ( T g ) values with increasing % clay. In addition, these trifluoromethyl groups‐containing nanocomposites films showed sharp lowering of coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) by 22%. Furthermore, they exhibited increased long‐term thermo‐oxidative stability (TOS), with % weight retention in the range of 86 to 92% in isothermal heating at 300 °C for 300 h in air, reduced water absorption at 100 RH at 50 °C in the range of 0.5 to 1.15%. These data are still much lower than those of neat ULTEM® 1000 and Kapton® H film. The modulus of elasticity is on an average 38% higher for the nanocomposite films relative to neat fluoropoly(ether‐imide) (6FDA + p ‐SED), and above non‐fluorinated polyimide films. The surface energy measurement by One‐Liquid and Two‐Liquid method showed a comparable trend of decreasing contact angle. For the nanocomposite films having 15% hydrophobic clay, the contact angle decreased by 21 and 20% for DI‐water and formamide, respectively. The surface energy increase was in the range of 8.21–8.54 mJ/m 2 . magnified image
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1