Comparison of hyperelastic models for granular materials

Abstract

Three recently proposed hyperelastic models for granular materials are compared with experiment data. Though all three are formulated to give elastic moduli that are power law functions of the mean stress, they have rather different dependencies on individual stresses, and generally differ from well established experimental forms. Predicted static stress distributions are in qualitative agreement with experiments, but do not differ greatly from isotropic linear elasticity, and similarly fail to account for variability in experiment data that presumably occurs due to a preparation dependence of granular materials.