Biochemical Diagnosis of Pheochromocytoma

TLDR

Diagnosis of pheochromocytoma relies on biochemical evidence of catecholamine production, yet the optimal test for establishing the diagnosis has not been determined. The study aimed to identify the biochemical test or combination of tests that provides the best method for diagnosing pheochromocytoma. A multicenter cohort study of patients tested at four referral centers between 1994 and 2001 included 214 confirmed pheochromocytoma cases and 644 non‑tumor controls. Plasma free metanephrines showed the highest sensitivity (99%) and, together with ROC analysis, the best specificity (89%), outperforming other catecholamine and metanephrine assays, and combining tests offered no additional diagnostic benefit, confirming plasma free metanephrines as the preferred diagnostic test for pheochromocytoma.

Abstract

ContextDiagnosis of pheochromocytoma depends on biochemical evidence of catecholamine production by the tumor. However, the best test to establish the diagnosis has not been determined.ObjectiveTo determine the biochemical test or combination of tests that provides the best method for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsMulticenter cohort study of patients tested for pheochromocytoma at 4 referral centers between 1994 and 2001. The analysis included 214 patients in whom the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma was confirmed and 644 patients who were determined to not have the tumor.Main Outcome MeasuresTest sensitivity and specificity, receiver operating characteristic curves, and positive and negative predictive values at different pretest prevalences using plasma free metanephrines, plasma catecholamines, urinary catecholamines, urinary total and fractionated metanephrines, and urinary vanillylmandelic acid.ResultsSensitivities of plasma free metanephrines (99% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 96%-100%]) and urinary fractionated metanephrines (97% [95% CI, 92%-99%]) were higher than those for plasma catecholamines (84% [95% CI, 78%-89%]), urinary catecholamines (86% [95% CI, 80%-91%]), urinary total metanephrines (77% [95% CI, 68%-85%]), and urinary vanillylmandelic acid (64% [95% CI, 55%-71%]). Specificity was highest for urinary vanillylmandelic acid (95% [95% CI, 93%-97%]) and urinary total metanephrines (93% [95% CI, 89%-97%]); intermediate for plasma free metanephrines (89% [95% CI, 87%-92%]), urinary catecholamines (88% [95% CI, 85%-91%]), and plasma catecholamines (81% [95% CI, 78%-84%]); and lowest for urinary fractionated metanephrines (69% [95% CI, 64%-72%]). Sensitivity and specificity values at different upper reference limits were highest for plasma free metanephrines using receiver operating characteristic curves. Combining different tests did not improve the diagnostic yield beyond that of a single test of plasma free metanephrines.ConclusionPlasma free metanephrines provide the best test for excluding or confirming pheochromocytoma and should be the test of first choice for diagnosis of the tumor.