Evolving scientific research governance in Australia: a case study of engaging interested publics in nanotechnology research

Evie Katz, Fiona Solomon, Wendy Mee, Roy R. Lovel

Public Understanding of Science · 2009 · 22 citations · 18 references

Concepts

Abstract

This paper examines the prospects for integrating social context questions within science and technology research and development governance. While the use of public engagement to investigate social aspects of emerging technologies is increasingly accepted, incorporating social understandings into research and development processes is far less developed. The paper outlines two Australian public engagement workshops in the social issues of nanotechnologies, and a third workshop with nanoscientists, which explored governance options for incorporating social context questions within research processes. Our research suggests that in Australia we are still some distance from integrating social issues into nanotechnology research and development governance. In part, this is because the difficulties of prediction and control of nanotechnologies, together with particular characteristics of scientific cultures and institutions, make both prospects and outcomes of integration difficult to assess.

References

18