Human Plague in the United States

Abstract

<h3>To the Editor:—</h3> The Aug 5, 1962 issue ofThe Journalcarried a cover picture of a painting by Arnold Böcklin entitled "Plague" and an article entitled "Human Plague in the United States" by Caten and Kartman. This article and the caption next to the cover picture carry misleading statements which I would like to call to your attention. Discussing the distribution of wild-rodent plague in the United States, Caten and Kartman state, "The reason why plague does not extend beyond the 100th meridian is poorly understood." While it is true that all human cases associated with wild rodents for which adequate data are available have been acquired west of the 100th meridian, and this corresponds quite well to the known distribution of wild-rodent plague, as shown by Caten and Kartman, very limited surveys of wild rodents and fleas for plague have been conducted east of the 100th meridian.¹Many investigators believe that wild-rodent plague does not extend into the eastern states, largely on the basis of the distribution of human cases associated with wild rodents. On the other hand, plague-infected wild rodents or their ectoparasites have been identified from over 130 counties in the western