Archives of Surgery · 2001 · 189 citations · 19 references
MedicinePhysiologySurgeryMicrosurgeryTissue EngineeringTransplant SurgeryGraft SurvivalHepatic PathophysiologyLiver Blood FlowLiver PhysiologyLiver TransplantationTransplant OutcomesBlood FlowHepatic HemodynamicsHepatic Microcirculatory DysfunctionLiver Microcirculatory DysfunctionMicrocirculatory AlterationsMicrocirculatory ImpairmentPortal HemodynamicsPortal Venous Pressure
BACKGROUND: Damage to a small-for-size liver graft after reperfusion is frequently observed but the mechanism of injury remains unclear. HYPOTHESIS: Injury to a small-for-size liver graft is related to the changes of portal pressure and blood flow. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival rates, portal hemodynamics, microcirculatory changes, and morphological changes (by light microscopy and electron microscopy). SETTING: A rat model of nonarterialized orthotopic liver transplantation comparing 2 groups of rats transplanted with whole grafts (100% of recipient liver weight) and small-for-size grafts (30% of recipient liver weight). RESULTS: Median survival of the rats with small-for-size grafts was 30 hours (range, 27-37 hours). During the first 15 minutes after reperfusion, mean arterial pressure of the small-for-size graft group was significantly lower than that of the whole graft group (10-minute: 100 vs 132 mm Hg, P =.04; 15-minute: 96 vs 127 mm Hg, P =.04). Portal pressure (in centimeters of water) of the small-for-size graft group was significantly higher in the first 20 minutes after reperfusion than the level before the anhepatic phase (5-minute: 15.1 vs 9.3, P =.02; 10-minute: 16.1 vs 9.3, P =.03; 15-minute, 13.5 vs 9.3, P =.03; 20-minute: 13.4 vs 9.3, P =.03) and was significantly higher than that of the whole graft group in the first 10 minutes after reperfusion (5-minute: 15.1 vs 9.6, P =.02; 10-minute: 16.1 vs 10.3, P =.04). Hepatic microcirculatory blood flow (in milliliters per minute per 100 g) was also significantly higher in the small-for-size graft group during the first 40 minutes after reperfusion (5-minute: 16.3 vs 9.3, P =.02; 10-minute: 14.9 vs 6.6, P =.02; 15-minute: 14.8 vs 5.5, P =.02; 20-minute: 13.1 vs 7.0, P =.02; 30-minute: 13.2 vs 8.8, P =.04; 40-minute: 14.6 vs 7.1, P =.02). Light and electron microscopy showed normal morphological features of whole graft up to 24 hours after reperfusion. The small-for-size graft, however, showed sinusoidal congestion, tremendous swelling of mitochondria of hepatocytes, irregular large gap of sinusoidal lining cells, and collapse of the space of Disse. CONCLUSIONS: In a rat model, the portal hemodynamic changes in small-for-size grafts are transient. Progressive damage of the graft may result from microcirculatory failure due to irreversible endothelial injury after reperfusion.
19
IMPACT OF GRAFT SIZE MISMATCHING ON GRAFT PROGNOSIS IN LIVER TRANSPLANTATION FROM LIVING DONORS1,2
Tetsuya Kiuchi, Mureo Kasahara, Kenji Uryuhara et al. · Transplantation · 1999 · 966 citations
Medicine, Pediatrics, Surgery +16
Functional Analysis of Grafts from Living Donors
Jean C. Emond, John F. Renz, Linda D. Ferrell et al. · Annals of Surgery · 1996 · 374 citations · Full text
Medicine, Pediatrics, Surgery +17
MINIMUM GRAFT SIZE FOR SUCCESSFUL LIVING DONOR LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
Chung‐Mau Lo, Chi-Leung Liu, John Chan et al. · Transplantation · 1999 · 287 citations
Medicine, Pediatrics, Surgery +16