INTRA- VS. INTERSPECIFIC LATITUDINAL VARIATION IN GROWTH: ADAPTATION TO TEMPERATURE OR SEASONALITY?

Abstract

In ectotherms, lower mean temperatures and shorter growing seasons at higher latitudes would be expected to cause a reduction in the annual growth rate of an individual. If slower growth reduces fitness, then organisms at higher latitudes may evolve compensatory responses for these climatic effects. Two such forms of local adaptation with increasing latitude are possible: (1) the capacity for growth may shift to a lower range of temperatures (i.e., temperature adaptation) or (2) maximum growth rate may evolve inversely with length of the growing season (i.e., countergradient variation). A third alternative is a mixed strategy involving both of the above. We hypothesized that the form of local adaptation may be affected by constraints that vary within vs. among species. We used common-environment experiments to compare reaction norms for growth in response to temperature among local populations of two contiguous, closely related fish species, the Atlantic silverside, Menidia menidia (L.), and the tidewater silverside, M. peninsulae (Goode and Bean), which together have a range spanning much of the North American Atlantic coast. The common-environment experiments revealed countergradient variation: maximum growth rate increased with latitude both within and among species. However, growth reaction norms of the northern species were shifted to a lower range of temperatures than those of the southern species, indicating adaptation to temperature at the interspecific level. Hence, adaptation to temperature contributes to the interspecific variation, while countergradient variation contributes to both the intra- and interspecific differences.