Towards a Comparative Theory of Locality in Migration Studies: Migrant Incorporation and City Scale

Nina Glick Schiller, Ayşe Çağlar

Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · 2009 · 594 citations · 78 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Migration scholars have lacked a comparative theory of locality, and urban restructuring scholars have not engaged with migration, yet migrant pathways both shape and are shaped by cities’ differential repositioning, positioning migrants as urban scale‑makers whose roles vary across global power fields. The article proposes a comparative scalar approach to migrant settlement and transnational connection, positing that city scale influences the relationship between post‑industrial city restructuring outcomes and migrant incorporation pathways. The article employs a city‑scale concept to relate post‑industrial city restructuring outcomes to migrant incorporation pathways.

Abstract

Building on the scholarship that theorises the restructuring of cities within neoliberal globalisation, this article calls for a comparative scalar approach to migrant settlement and transnational connection. Deploying a concept of city scale, the article posits a relationship between the differing outcomes of the restructuring of post-industrial cities and varying pathways of migrant incorporation. Committed to the use of nation-states and ethnic groups as primary units of analysis, migration scholars have lacked a comparative theory of locality; scholars of urban restructuring have not engaged in migration studies. Yet migrant pathways are both shaped by and contribute to the differential repositioning of cities. Migrants are viewed as urban scale-makers with roles that vary in relationship to the different positioning of cities within global fields of power.

References

78