HumanitiesPhilosophyLiterary CriticismRhetoricRhetorical StudiesAristotelian PhilosophyPoeticsRhetorical AnalysisRhetorical CriticismRhetorical TheoryClassical Rhetorical Theory
Aristotle’s Rhetoric integrates logic and virtue, a perspective highlighted by Garver. Garver seeks to determine whether rhetoric can serve as a civic art that shapes citizens’ character, linking it to ethics and politics. Garver analyzes Aristotle’s Rhetoric by treating it as philosophy, connecting it to ethics and politics, and applying rigorous rational analysis to the activity itself. Aristotle sees rhetorical activities—advice, policy decisions, legal persuasion—as artful, non‑deceptive practices that combine character, emotion, and reason.
In this contribution to philosophy and rhetoric, Eugene Garver shows how Aristotle integrates logic and virtue in his treatise, the Rhetoric. Garver argues that Aristotle raises and answers a central question: can there be a civic art of rhetoric, an art that forms the character of citizens? By demonstrating the importance of the Rhetoric for understanding current philosophical problems of practical reason, virtue and character, Garver treats the Rhetoric as philosophy and connects its themes with parallel problems in Aristotle's Ethics and Politics. Garver explores how Aristotle, instead of looking at the motives of rhetoricians or the effects of rhetorical practices, addresses the very activity of rhetoric and subjects it to rigorous rational analysis. On Aristotle's view, such rhetorical activities as giving advice, making policy decisions and persuading others in legal matters can be understood as artful, but not deceptive, activities in which the rhetorician brings to bear character, emotion and reason.