Respiration · 2000 · 21 citations · 22 references
MedicineOtolaryngologyAnesthesiaPulmonologySleep MedicineAirway AssessmentAirway ManagementAirway ObstructionContinuous Positive Airway PressurePositive Airway Pressure TherapySleep Apnea CareAirway Pressure MonitoringContinuous Positive Airway Pressure MonitoringObstructive Sleep Apnea TherapyObstructive Sleep Apnea TreatmentPolysomnography AnalysisRespiratory Impedance MeasurementSleep Apnea MonitoringSleep Apnea Syndrome
BACKGROUND: Measurement of impedance using forced oscillation technique is a sensitive means of detecting airway obstructions, including the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to determine whether treatment with an automated impedance-controlled continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) device (APAP(FOT)) is possible in patients with OSAS, and which is the best range of pressure variation in automatical CPAP treatment. We investigated two modes of APAP(FOT) with different pressure ranges: (1) the widest technically possible pressure range and (2) a range with individually defined minimum pressure. METHODS: Ten patients [9 men, age 56.6+/-10.5 years, BMI 32.0+/-4.5 kg/m(2), apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) 18.2+/-13.3 /h] had a diagnostic polysomnography (baseline). After manual titration of positive airway pressure they were submitted, in randomized order, to two modes of the APAP(FOT) device, namely pressure range of 4.0- 15.5 mbar (mode 1 free range) and an individually fixed higher minimum pressure with a maximum pressure of 15.5 mbar (mode 2). RESULTS: While the manually titrated pressure was 8.0+/-1.3 mbar, in mode 1 it was 5.6+/-2.1 mbar (p<0.01); in mode 2 7.3+/-1.6 mbar (p< 0.05). Both of these modes suppressed abnormal respiratory events (baseline AHI 18.2+/-13.3/h; mode 1: 2.5+/-1.9; mode 2: 1.8 +/-0.7, p<0.01 in each case), and increased slow wave sleep (baseline: 10.6+/-8.0%, mode 1: 20.2+/-10.4%, p<0.05; mode 2: 22.3+/-9.3%, p<0.01). In mode 1, the pressure was lower than that titrated manually in 73.2% of total sleep time, in mode 2 in 48.6%, while pressures higher than those derived manually were observed in 13.0% in mode 1 and in 19.1% in mode 2. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that impedance-controlled CPAP (APAP(FOT)) allows adequate treatment of OSAS patients at significantly lower pressures as compared with manually titrated pressure. Differences between the two modes are only minor.
22
A New Method for Measuring Daytime Sleepiness: The Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Murray W. Johns · SLEEP · 1991 · 17.2K citations · Full text
Medicine, Neurology, Psychometrics +16
<i>Oscillation Mechanics of Lungs and Chest in Man</i>
Arthur B. DuBois, Alfred W. Brody, David H. Lewis et al. · Journal of Applied Physiology · 1956 · 817 citations
Pharmacy, Physics, Physiology +11
Effect of Age on EEG Arousals in Normal Sleep
Mirella Boselli, Liborio Parrino, Arianna Smerieri et al. · SLEEP · 1998 · 218 citations · Full text