Journal of Environmental Engineering · 2009 · 75 citations · 8 references
Natural ResourcesEnvironmental SciencesWater Resources ManagementRiver Basin ManagementUrban Watershed ManagementWatershed EcologyBioretention SystemsFreshwater Fish EcologyRiver EcologyStream EcologyWatershed ResponseAquatic Ecosystem ResponsesBioretention System AnalysisDrain DepthRiver Runoff ImpactsStream Temperature MitigationTemperature Effects On FishThermal Effects Of ImpactsThermal Mitigation Measures
A study was conducted in western North Carolina, along the southeastern extent of the U.S. trout populations, to examine the effect of bioretention areas on runoff temperature. Four bioretention areas were monitored during the summers of 2006 and 2007. It was found that smaller bioretention areas, with respect to the size of their contributing watershed, were able to significantly reduce both maximum and median water temperatures between the inlet and outlet. The proportionately larger bioretention areas were only able to significantly reduce maximum water temperatures between the inlet and outlet; however, these systems showed evidence of substantial reductions in outflow quantity, effectively reducing the thermal impact. Despite temperature reductions, effluent temperatures still posed a potential threat to coldwater streams during the peak summer months. During the summer months, effluent temperatures were generally coolest at the greatest soil depths, supporting evidence of an optimum drain depth between 90 and 120 cm. The ability of bioretention areas to reduce storm-water temperature and flows supports their application to reduce the thermal impacts of urban storm-water runoff.
8
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Frank Wilcoxon · Biometrics Bulletin · 1945 · 14.4K citations
Business, Computer Science, Multi-criteria Decision Making +8