Climate‐related range shifts – a global multidimensional synthesis and new research directions

TLDR

Poleward and upward shifts are the most common responses to climate change, yet east‑west, tropical, and lower‑elevation shifts are rapidly increasing and may be expected once local climate changes are considered. The study synthesizes recent research on climate‑related range shifts, identifies geographic, taxonomic, and methodological gaps, and proposes a research agenda and a unified classification framework. The authors review geographical patterns of species range shifts across terrestrial and marine ecosystems, identify research shortfalls, and outline a comprehensive framework for assessing multidimensional distribution changes against climate‑change indices. The synthesis reveals gaps—especially in tropical regions, prokaryotes, lowland terrestrial plants, and marine plant bathymetric shifts—and demonstrates that mapping observed and expected shifts in a bi‑dimensional space can improve extinction‑risk assessments.

Abstract

Poleward and upward shifts are the most frequent types of range shifts that have been reported in response to contemporary climate change. However, the number of reports documenting other types of range shifts – such as in east‐west directions across longitudes or, even more unexpectedly, towards tropical latitudes and lower elevations – is increasing rapidly. Recent studies show that these range shifts may not be so unexpected once the local climate changes are accounted for. We here provide an updated synthesis of the fast‐moving research on climate‐related range shifts. By describing the current state of the art on geographical patterns of species range shifts under contemporary climate change for plants and animals across both terrestrial and marine ecosystems, we identified a number of research shortfalls. In addition to the recognised geographic shortfall in the tropics, we found taxonomic and methodological shortfalls with knowledge gaps regarding range shifts of prokaryotes, lowland range shifts of terrestrial plants, and bathymetric range shifts of marine plants. Based on this review, we provide a research agenda for filling these gaps. We outline a comprehensive framework for assessing multidimensional changes in species distributions, which should then be contrasted with expectations based on climate change indices, such as velocity measures accounting for complex local climate changes. Finally, we propose a unified classification of geographical patterns of species range shifts, arranged in a bi‐dimensional space defined by species’ persistence and movement rates. Placing the observed and expected shifts into this bi‐dimensional space should lead to more informed assessments of extinction risks.