The Integrity Paradox

Paul Nieuwenburg

Public Integrity · 2007 · 23 citations · 11 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Public integrity builds citizen trust and promotes good governance, yet it paradoxically pressures officials to disclose violations that may erode that trust. The paradox arises from a failure to appreciate the nature of the concept of integrity.

Abstract

Public integrity is a good thing, because it restores citizens' trust in government. This, in turn, is a good thing, because it promotes good government. Notwithstanding its truth, this argument creates a paradox for public officials who use it to justify integrity. On the one hand, a government's sincere commitment to integrity entails an obligation to reveal its own violations of integrity, which is not likely to increase trust. On the other hand, such revelations nonetheless must be made, for not to do so would constitute a violation of the commitment to integrity. The paradox arises from a failure to appreciate the nature of the concept of integrity.

References

11