Primary Care and Health

Barbara Starfield

JAMA · 1991 · 223 citations · 10 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The United Kingdom’s discordant ratings may stem from comparatively low spending on social services and public education. The study compared ten Western industrialized nations using indices of primary care extent, health indicators, and population satisfaction relative to costs, drawing data mainly from published sources. Nine of the ten countries showed concordance among primary care, health outcomes, and satisfaction‑cost ratios, while the United States and West Germany scored low and Canada, Sweden, and the Netherlands scored high, informing debates on U.S. health system reform.

Abstract

Ten Western industrialized nations were compared on the basis of three characteristics: the extent of their primary health service, their levels of 12 health indicators (eg, infant mortality, life expectancy, and age-adjusted death rates), and the satisfaction of their populations in relation to overall costs of the systems. Information was derived primarily from published sources. Indices were developed to characterize the extent of primary care in each country and the standing of each country relative to the others on the health indicators. There was general concordance for primary care, the health indicators, and the satisfaction-expense ratio in nine of the 10 countries. Ratings for the United States were low on all three measures. West Germany also had low ratings. In contrast, Canada, Sweden, and the Netherlands had generally high ratings for all three measures. The lack of concordance in the ratings in the United Kingdom may be a result of relatively low expenditures for other social services and public education in that country. The findings may add to the debate and deliberations concerning modifications in organization and financing of care that are currently being considered in the United States. (<i>JAMA</i>. 1991;266:2268-2271)

References

10