Publication | Closed Access
Automating camera management for lecture room environments
102
Citations
16
References
2001
Year
Unknown Venue
EngineeringCommunicationMedia TechnologyImage AnalysisCamera NetworkVirtual RealityVideo Content AnalysisProfessional Video ProducersMachine VisionNetwork InfrastructureVideo ManipulationCamera ManagementComputer ScienceMultimedia ManagementVideo DistributionComputer VisionLecture RecordingVirtual Video DirectorVideo CommunicationEye TrackingHuman-computer InteractionArts
Rapid advances in network and streaming media have enabled widespread online lecture recording, yet producing high‑quality videos remains labor‑intensive, prompting interest in automated camera management. This paper presents the design, implementation, and evaluation of an automated camera‑management system for lecture rooms. Guided by interviews with professional video producers, the authors developed production rules and a virtual video director, then compared the system’s performance to a human operator in a user study. The system achieved video quality indistinguishable from human control, with most remote viewers unable to discern whether the footage was produced by a computer or a person.
Given rapid improvements in network infrastructure and streaming-media technologies, a large number of corporations and universities are recording lectures and making them available online for anytime, anywhere access. However, producing high-quality lecture videos is still labor intensive and expensive. Fortunately, recent technology advances are making it feasible to build automated camera management systems to capture lectures. In this paper we report on our design, implementation and study of such a system. Compared to previous work-which has tended to be technology centric-we started with interviews with professional video producers and used their knowledge and expertise to create video production rules. We then targeted technology components that allowed us to implement a substantial portion of these rules, including the design of a virtual video director. The system's performance was compared to that of a human operator via a user study. Results suggest that our system's quality in close to that of a human-controlled system. In fact most remote audience members could not tell if the video was produced by a computer or a person.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1