Journal of Endourology · 2010 · 44 citations · 8 references
MedicineSurgeryUrologyGenitourinary OncologySurgical OncologyUrologic SurgeryBladder SurgeryCancer RestagingTumor StagingUrogenital Oncology SurgeryUrologic Cancer DiagnosisUrologic Oncology SurgeryBladder Cancer DiagnosisBladder Tumor CharacterizationBladder Tumor ExcisionBladder Tumor SurgeryHistopathologic ConfirmationHistopathologic StagingTransurethral Resection Specimen EvaluationUrinary Bladder Tumor Detection
PURPOSE: Evaluation of second-look transurethral resection (TUR) in avoidance of staging errors, and determination of risk factors of upstaging in patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An analytic prospective cohort study included 91 patients with stage T(1) and T(a) bladder cancer. All patients underwent second-look TUR within 2 to 6 weeks after the initial resection. Histopathologic findings of the second TUR of bladder tumor (TURBT) were compared with those of the initial one. RESULTS: Specimens obtained during the second TURBT showed no tumor in 38 (41.7%) patients; 22 (24.2%) patients had residual cancer of the same stage, 9 (14.8%) patients of PT(1) had a lower stage, and 22 (24.2%) had a higher stage. Upstaging had changed treatment strategy in 22 (24.2%) cases. Appearance, size, grade, and stage of the tumor at the initial resection are all considered independent risk factors for upstaging detected at second-look TURBT. CONCLUSIONS: Second TURBT is a valuable procedure for accurate staging of nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. It changed the treatment strategy of a significant proportion of our patients. Second TURBT is indicated in T(1), high grade, large size (>3 cm), and nodular tumors because of the significant risk of detecting muscle-invasive disease.
8
Management of stage T1 tumors of the bladder: International Consensus Panel
Alan M. Nieder, Maurizio Brausi, Donald L. Lamm et al. · Urology · 2005 · 218 citations