Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2000 · 569 citations · 10 references
Natural SciencesEarth SciencesOceanographyAtmospheric RadiationAtmospheric ScienceCloud PhysicsAtmospheric Effects On ObservationsAtmospheric OpticsAtmospheric Sounding From SatellitesCloud Optical PropertiesCloud PropertiesCloud Radiative EffectsClear-sky Radiation EstimationDiurnal CycleDownwelling RadiationIrradiance Uncertainty QuantificationShortwave Cloud Radiative EffectsShortwave Radiation EffectsSky RadianceSolar Zenith Angle
The authors develop an automated method that identifies clear‑sky periods for a 160° field of view using only one‑minute surface downwelling total and diffuse shortwave irradiance measurements. The method is validated against whole‑sky imagery, lidar, observer reports, and model comparisons, and it fits clear‑sky irradiance functions of solar zenith angle to generate continuous estimates of total, diffuse, and direct shortwave irradiance, which are then subtracted from measured values to quantify cloud effects. The resulting clear‑sky irradiance estimates have root‑mean‑square uncertainty comparable to the instruments, and the derived cloud‑effect calculations reduce uncertainty from pyranometer offsets and cosine‑response errors, enabling any dataset with downwelling diffuse and total shortwave measurements to be processed for clear‑sky identification and cloud‑effect estimation.
We present an automated method to identify periods of clear skies for a 160° field of view using only 1‐min measurements of surface downwelling total and diffuse shortwave irradiance. The clear‐sky detection method is verified using Whole Sky Imager and lidar data, observer reports, and model comparisons. Identified clear‐sky irradiance measurements are then used to empirically fit clear‐sky irradiance functions using the cosine of the solar zenith angle as the independent variable. These fitted functions produce continuous estimates of clear‐sky total, diffuse, and direct component shortwave irradiances. While this method ignores diurnal changes in such variables as column water vapor and aerosol amounts and changes between clear‐sky days, it is shown that the resultant clear‐sky irradiance estimates have RMS uncertainty comparable to the uncertainty of the measuring instruments themselves. The estimated clear‐sky irradiances are used to estimate the effect of clouds on the downwelling shortwave irradiance as a difference between the measured and clear‐sky amounts. We show that the cloud effect calculations from this method appear to decrease the uncertainty due to systematic pyranometer offsets and cosine response errors. Thus any data set that includes downwelling diffuse and total shortwave measurements can be processed to identify clear‐sky periods and produce estimates of clear‐sky irradiance and cloud effects.
10
Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing
Eric R. Ziegel, William H. Press, Brian P. Flannery et al. · Technometrics · 1987 · 4.6K citations
Absorption of Solar Radiation by Clouds: Observations Versus Models
R. D. Cess, Minghua Zhang, Patrick Minnis et al. · Science · 1995 · 391 citations