Journal of the history of philosophy · 2004 · 165 citations · 7 references
HumanitiesBiologyPhilosophyNature Of SciencePhilosophy Of BiologyPhilosophy Of MindClassical MechanicsConstitutive RelationsAristotelian CausalityAristotle's BiologyAristotle's TeleologyCausal DependenceMechanistic PhilosophyNatural Teleology
Kant’s notion of mechanical inexplicability has two facets: one shared with artefacts, where regularities cannot be reduced to matter, and one unique to organisms, involving reciprocal causal dependence among parts, mirroring Aristotle’s teleological and natural organism strands. The study distinguishes two senses of mechanical inexplicability in organisms for Kant. This distinction shows how a teleological view of organisms can align with contemporary biological advances.
I distinguish two senses in which organisms are mechanically inexplicable for Kant. Mechanical inexplicability in the first sense is shared with artefacts, and consists in their exhibiting regularities irreducible to the regularities of matter. Mechanical inexplicability in the second sense is peculiar to organisms, consisting in the reciprocal causal dependence of an organism's parts. This distinction corresponds to two strands of thought in Aristotle, one supporting a teleological conception of organisms, the other supporting a conception of organisms as natural. Recognizing this distinction helps us to see how a teleological conception of organisms is compatible with recent advances in biology.
7
Evolution from Molecules to Men.
Geoffrey Fryer, D. S. Bendal · Journal of Ecology · 1984 · 1.1K citations
Essays on Aristotle's De Anima.
D. W. Hamlyn, Martha C. Nussbaum, Amélie Oksenberg Rorty · The Philosophical Quarterly · 1993 · 552 citations
The genesis of Kant's Critique of judgment
Choice Reviews Online · 1993 · 337 citations
Humanities, Philosophy, Religion +14