Helping Processes in a Mutual Aid Organization for Persons with Emotional Disturbance

Siu‐Kau Cheung, Stephen Y. K. Sun

International Journal of Group Psychotherapy · 2001 · 16 citations · 22 references

Concepts

TL;DR

To date, the notion of helpfulness of group processes has been equivocal in research on self‑help groups. The study argues that subjective appraisals of helpfulness differ from correlational findings and proposes a two‑level hierarchy distinguishing sustaining and beneficial factors, suggesting that facilitation should target different factors at distinct stages of group development. The authors introduce a two‑level hierarchy that separates sustaining from beneficial factors to guide facilitation across group development stages. In a mutual aid organization for adults with mental health problems, universality, self‑disclosure, and instillation of hope were the most valued processes, while support and catharsis were the strongest correlates of participation benefits.

Abstract

To date, the notion of helpfulness of group processes has been equivocal in research on self-help groups. This article argues that findings drawn from the participants' subjective appraisals of helpfulness carry meanings different from those drawn from the correlational approach. In a mutual aid organization serving adults with mental health problems, the study found that, whereas universality, self-disclosure, and instillation of hope were the most valued processes, support and catharsis were the strongest correlates of benefits of participation. The authors propose a two-level hierarchy that distinguishes sustaining and beneficial factors. Different sets of factors should constitute the focus of facilitation at different stages of group development.

References

22