Two views of malingering

Abstract

Abstract Two views of malingering are juxtaposed. The first describes the conceptual muddle and subjectivity associated with assessments of alleged malingering. It is suggested that clinicians avoid the label, especially with patients they cannot help. The second view argues that avoiding the diagnostic process may place the clinician at a distinct disadvantage by missing deceptive behaviors. The authors express differences of opinion about the technology available for assessment, the importance of intentions, and the clinician's responsibility in legal dilemmas.