Supernatural Agency: Individual Difference Predictors and Situational Correlates

Kirsten Barnes, Nicholas J. S. Gibson

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · 2012 · 30 citations · 55 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Belief in supernatural agents is cross‑culturally common, theorized to arise from a hypersensitive agency detection device, yet not all religious believers report such experiences. The study surveyed 583 participants, comparing those with no SRSP experiences to those with at least one, to examine individual differences. Participants reporting SRSP experiences showed higher positive schizotypy, thinner mental boundaries, and greater empathy, though these traits were not unique to agentic experiences, and nonreligious supernatural agency was more likely to occur in threatening, ambiguous contexts with heightened negative affect, supporting Barrett’s hypothesis that agency detection thresholds drop under such conditions.

Abstract

Barrett (2004) Barrett, J. L. 2004. Why would anyone believe in God? Oxford, , England: AltaMira.. [Google Scholar] proposed that belief in God, ghosts, and other supernatural agents is cross-culturally ubiquitous because of a cognitive Hypersensitive Agency Detection Device with the propensity to find agents in the environment. However, supernatural agency experiences are not reported by all religious believers. A survey explored individual differences between those reporting never having had a spiritual, religious, supernatural, or paranormal (SRSP) experience (n = 284) and those who reported at least one (n = 299). SRSP experiences were associated with a distinct psychological profile, including higher scores on measures of positive schizotypy, thinner mental boundaries, and empathy; however, the difference in psychological profile was not specific to agentic SRSP experience. Experiences of nonreligious supernatural agency (n = 80) were more likely than other types of SRSP experiences to have occurred in a threatening and ambiguous environment and to be accompanied by increased negative affect, thus providing initial support for Barrett's hypothesis that the threshold for agency detection is lowered under such conditions.

References

55