Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

A Modified Labeling Theory Approach to Mental Disorders: An Empirical Assessment

1.9K

Citations

27

References

1989

Year

TLDR

Critics dispute Scheff’s labeling theory, arguing it overemphasizes stigma and stereotyping. The study proposes a modified labeling theory that posits labeling can cause negative outcomes even if it does not directly cause mental disorder. The authors argue that socialization shapes beliefs about treating mental patients, which are reinterpreted upon treatment entry, leading patients to adopt secrecy, education, or withdrawal strategies. Patients who fear rejection feel threatened, adopt secrecy, withdrawal, or education strategies, which in turn harm their social support, employment, and self‑esteem.

Abstract

Critics of labeling theory vigorously dispute Scheff's (1966) provocative etiological hypothesis and downplay the importance of factors such as stigma and stereotyping. We propose a modified labeling perspective which claims that even if labeling does not directly produce mental disorder, it can lead to negative outcomes. Our approach asserts that socialization leads individuals to develop a set of beliefs about how treat mental patients. When individuals enter treatment, these beliefs take on new meaning. The more patients believe that they will be devalued and discriminated against, the more they feel threatened by interacting with others. They may keep their treatment a secret, try to educate others about their situation, or withdraw from social contacts that they perceive as potentially rejecting. Such strategies can lead to negative consequences for social support networks, jobs, and self-esteem. We test this modified labeling perspective using samples of patients and untreated community residents, and find that both believe that most people will reject mental patients. Additionally, patients endorse strategies of secrecy, withdrawal, and education to cope with the threat they perceive. Finally, patients' social support networks are affected by the extent to which they fear rejection and by the coping responses they adopt to deal with their stigmatized status.

References

YearCitations

1990

65.6K

1969

14.3K

1981

5.3K

1984

2K

1985

1.9K

1968

1.4K

1987

1.3K

1984

820

1981

623

1985

514

Page 1