American Journal of Botany · 1982 · 271 citations · 58 references
Life SciencesEvolutionary BiologyPlant BiologyPlant EcologyPlant EvolutionPlant Reproductive BiologyEvolution Of FlowersFloral TraitsInflorescence MorphologyPlant-pollinator InteractionsPollination BiologyReproductive PhenologyFloral Display TraitsInflorescence ArchitectureInflorescence Size VariationOutcrossing EvolutionOutcrossing SuccessPollination-related Floral TraitsPollinator AttractionPredation
The adaptive significance of different types of inflorescences in flowering plants has been largely ignored. The few published studies investigating adaptive aspects of floral displays suggest that numbers of flowers and their arrangement in space and time determine levels of pollination and fruit‐set in natural populations. The frequently conflicting demands placed on inflorescence architecture have led to an evolutionary compromise that maximizes the genetic contribution of an individual plant to the next generation. These conflicting demands include pollinator attraction vs. ovary competition, fruit dispersal vs. fruit predation, and reproductive vs. vegetative resource allocation. In most cases, the inflorescence size most successful in fruit production is also the most frequent in natural populations. In addition to quantity of offspring, inflorescence architecture affects, and in turn is affected by, the quality of offspring that result from selfing vs. outcrossing.
58
Daniel H. Janzen · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · 1971 · 2K citations
Flowering Plants. Evolution above the Species Level
Arthur Cronquist, G. Ledyard Stebbins · Taxon · 1975 · 1.4K citations
The Principles of Pollination Ecology.
Herbert G. Baker, K. Faegri, Leendert van der Pijl · Journal of Ecology · 1972 · 1.2K citations
Life Sciences, Biology, Ecology +12
Evolution of Dioecy in Flowering Plants
Kamaljit S. Bawa · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · 1980 · 975 citations