Integrative reviews of nursing research

TLDR

Integrative reviews are valuable for organizing literature and should meet the same clarity, rigor, and replication standards as primary research. This paper discusses methods for conducting an integrative review. The authors examined 17 nursing journal reviews and compared them to a proposed set of review criteria. Most integrative reviews in nursing did not meet primary research standards, and the authors present guidelines for more rigorous reviews.

Abstract

Integrative reviews of research are a valuable part of the process of creating and organizing a body of literature. It has been argued that integrative reviews should be held to the same standards of clarity, rigor, and replication as primary research. In this paper methods for conducting an integrative review are discussed. Seventeen reviews from nursing journals were examined and compared with a proposed set of criteria for reviews. The results indicated that the majority of integrative reviews in nursing fell short of primary research standards. Guidelines for conducting more rigorous reviews are presented.