SIAM Journal on Computing · 1998 · 728 citations · 28 references
ComputingComputer ScienceMathematicsAlgorithmsProbability TheoryTheory Of ComputationAlgorithm AnalysisComputational ComplexityInteractive Proof SystemsProof ComplexityRandomized ComputationTheorem ProvingError ReductionParallel RepetitionProbabilistic Proof SystemsRandomized Proof SystemsTwo-prover One-round Proof Systems
We show that a parallel repetition of any two-prover one-round proof system (MIP(2,1)) decreases the probability of error at an exponential rate. No constructive bound was previously known. The constant in the exponent (in our analysis) depends only on the original probability of error and on the total number of possible answers of the two provers. The dependency on the total number of possible answers is logarithmic, which was recently proved to be almost the best possible [U. Feige and O. Verbitsky, Proc.11th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1996, pp. 70--76].
28
Clique is hard to approximate within n1−ε
Johan Håstad · Acta Mathematica · 1999 · 1.4K citations · Full text
Proof verification and hardness of approximation problems
Sanjeev Arora, Carsten Lund, R. Motwani et al. · 1992 · 744 citations
On the distributional complexity of disjointness
Alexander Razborov · Theoretical Computer Science · 1992 · 485 citations
Multi-prover interactive proofs: how to remove intractability
Michael Ben-Or, Shafi Goldwasser, Joe Kilian · 1988 · 484 citations