Publication | Closed Access
Utilization of Silver Hydrogel Sheet Dressing on Postsurgical Incisions
15
Citations
34
References
2013
Year
Tissue EngineeringWound AssessmentSurgeryOrthopaedic SurgerySilver HydrogelSurgical Site InfectionsSelf-healing MaterialHealthcare-associated InfectionOrthopaedicsWound CareInfection ControlSkin SubstituteScar PreventionWound InfectionAntibioticsSilver Hydrogel DressingsLower Extremity WoundClinical InfectionWound HealingMedicinePostsurgical IncisionsProsthetic Joint InfectionsPlastic SurgerySilver Hydrogel Sheet
Silver hydrogel dressings are antimicrobial, nonadherent, and have an absorptive capacity many times their weight. Fifty-nine (49.44 ± 16.85 years) foot and ankle patients with incisions >1 cm were prospectively enrolled to compare infection, scarring, and complication rates between the postoperative use of a silver hydrogel sheet (SHS) dressing and a standard petroleum-based (P) dressing. Overall, there were 5 (8.47%) infections; 4 (6.78%) superficial and 1 (1.69%) deep. The SHS group had 1 (3.45%) superficial infection, whereas the P group had 3 (10.00%) superficial infections and 1 (3.33%) deep infection. Infection incidence was similar for both groups (P = .37). However, in the P group, 3 (10.00%) patients developed wound dehiscence and 1 (1.69%) patient developed a fibrinous scab. Compared with SHS patients, the P patients had a greater incidence of incisional complications (1 [3.45%] vs 8 [26.67%], respectively; P = .03). The percent change in scar length was greater in the SHS group (18.04 ± 41.10%) when compared with the P group (2.00 ± 9.93%; P < .001) while the percent change in scar width was similar in the 2 groups (P = .19). The lower incidence of incisional complications and the greater reduction in scar length suggest that the inherent properties of the silver hydrogel dressing aid in postsurgical healing.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1