Publication | Closed Access
The relations of emotionality and regulation to dispositional and situational empathy-related responding.
538
Citations
49
References
1994
Year
Social PsychologyEmpathyAffective NeuroscienceEducationPsychologySocial SciencesEmotional ResponseEmotional SkillsEmotion RegulationEmotional IntensityNegative AffectHeart RateBehavioral SciencesPsychiatryApplied Social PsychologyEmotional IntelligenceEmotion ProcessingSocial CognitionMindfulnessSituational Empathy-related RespondingInterpersonal RelationshipsEmotional DevelopmentEmotionAdaptive EmotionAffect Regulation
The study aimed to determine how emotional intensity, affect, and regulation predict adults' situational and dispositional empathy responses. Researchers used self‑reports, facial expressions, and heart‑rate data to assess situational vicarious emotional responses, while self‑ and friend reports evaluated dispositional traits. Dispositional sympathy, personal distress, and perspective taking displayed distinct associations with emotionality and regulation, while situational vicarious responses varied by measure and gender—particularly facial and heart‑rate data in men—confirming that individual differences in emotionality and regulation influence empathy‑related responding.
The purpose of the present study was to examine the prediction of adults' situational and dispositional empathy-related responses from measures of emotionality (emotional intensity and positive and negative affect) and regulation. A multimethod approach including self-reported, facial, and heart rate (HR) responses was used to assess situational vicarious emotional responding; Ss' (and sometimes friends') reports were used to assess the dispositional characteristics. In general, dispositional sympathy, personal distress, and perspective taking exhibited different, conceptually logical patterns of association with indexes of emotionality and regulation. The relations of situational measures of vicarious emotional responding to dispositional emotionality and regulation varied somewhat by type of measure and gender. Findings for facial and HR (for men) measures were primarily for the more evocative empathy-inducing stimulus. In general, the findings provided support for the role of individual differences in emotionality and regulation in empathy-related responding.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1