Publication | Closed Access
Respiratory-Syncytial-Virus Infections, Reinfections and Immunity
710
Citations
17
References
1979
Year
VaccinationRespiratory Virus ImmunityViral PersistenceRespiratory DiseasesImmunologyPediatricsRespiratory IllnessVirologyRespiratory InfectionInfectious Respiratory DiseasePediatric Lung DiseaseInfection ControlThird InfectionEarly InfancyMedicineRespiratory-syncytial-virus InfectionsEpidemiologyCovid-19
The study aimed to elucidate acquired immunity to respiratory syncytial virus by analyzing 10 years of longitudinal data from healthy children followed from infancy. Immunity was quantified by the likelihood of avoiding infection and by the decrease in clinical severity during reinfections. Across seven outbreaks over ten years, first‑time infection attack rates were 98 %, dropping to 75 % for second infections and 65 % for third, with age and prior infection history influencing severity; a single infection did not prevent reinfection one year later, but the third infection markedly reduced illness severity, implying that reducing disease severity may be a more attainable goal for immunoprophylaxis.
To better understand acquired immunity to respiratory-syncytial-virus infections, we analyzed data from a 10-year study of respiratory illness in normal children who were followed longitudinally from early infancy. Immunity was measured in terms of failure to become infected or reduction in severity of clinical illness upon reinfection. Outbreaks of infections occurred seven times over the 10-year-period. During epidemics the attack rate for first infection was 98 per cent. The rate for second infections (75 per cent) was modestly reduced (P less than 0.001); that for third infections was 65 per cent. Age and history of infection both influenced illness. Immunity induced by a single infection had no demonstrable effect on illness associated with reinfection one year later; however, a considerable reduction in severity occurred with the third infection. These observations suggest that amelioration of illness--rather than prevention of infection--may be a realistic goal for immunoprophylaxis.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1