American Journal of Sociology · 1959 · 52 citations · 0 references
LawEducational PsychologyForensic PsychologyHuman PerformanceIndividual DifferencesAbility ComparisonGender In PerformanceJury Decision-makingJury SelectionJury TrialTrial PracticeJuror AttitudesJuror BiasJuror CompetenceJury Deliberation DynamicsJury ReasoningPersuasion In Jury DeliberationsSocial Influence In JuriesSocioeconomic Status Discrimination
Variations in the performance of real jurors of differing socioeconomic status who were deliberating on a mock trial were assessed. Male jurors participate more actively than female, and participation varies in direct ratio to length of education. Jurors spend 50 per cent of the time exchanging personal experiences, 25 per cent on procedural questions, 15 per cent on reviewing facts of the case, and 8 per cent on the court's instructions. The more educated give relatively more emphasis to procedure and instructions; the less educated to testimony, personal experiences, and opinions. Jurors appreciate participation in their fellows, apart from education. No significant differences were observed between the more-and the less-educated jurors in their ability either to influence other members of the jury or to be persuaded by them.