Annals of Surgery · 2007 · 630 citations · 21 references
MedicineOncologySurgeryOncologic SurgerySurgical OncologySurvival AnalysisCancer MortalityCancer Survival AnalysisSurgical Resource UtilizationSurvival OutcomesEnd-of-life Cancer MortalityLate MortalityMortality In HospitalsPostoperative MortalitySurgical Volume Variation
In Brief Context: Although hospital procedure volume is clearly related to operative mortality with many cancer procedures, its effect on late survival is not well characterized. Objective: To examine relationships between hospital volume and late survival after different types of cancer resections. Design: Using the national Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database (1992–2002), we identified all patients undergoing major resections for lung, esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, colon, and bladder cancer (n = 64,047). Relationships between hospital volume and survival were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for patient characteristics and use of adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy. Study Participants: U.S. Medicare patients residing in SEER regions. Main Outcome Measures: 5-year survival. Results: Although there were statistically significant relationships between hospital volume and 5-year survival with all 6 cancer types, the relative importance of volume varied markedly. Absolute differences in 5-year survival probabilities rates between low-volume hospitals (LVHs) and high-volume hospitals (HVHs) ranged from 17% for esophageal cancer resection (17% vs. 34%, respectively) to only 3% for colon cancer resection (45% vs. 48%). Absolute differences in 5-year survival between LVHs and HVHs fell between these ranges for lung (6%), gastric (6%), pancreatic (5%), and bladder cancer (4%). Volume-related differences in late survival could not be attributed to differences in rates of adjuvant therapy. Conclusions: Along with lower operative mortality, HVHs have better late survival rates with selected cancer resections than their lower-volume counterparts. Mechanisms underlying their better outcomes and thus opportunities for improvement remain to be identified. Using the SEER-Medicare database, we identified all patients undergoing major resections for lung, esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, colon, and bladder cancer between 1992 and 1999. Although the magnitude of the volume-outcome effect varied markedly, there were statistically significant relationships between hospital volume and 5-year survival with all 6 cancer types. Volume-related differences in late survival could not be attributed to differences in rates of adjuvant therapy.
21
Comorbidity Measures for Use with Administrative Data
Anne Elixhauser, Claudia Steiner, D.R. Harris et al. · Medical Care · 1998 · 9.9K citations
Education, Health Services Administration, Health Assessment +16
Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United States
John D. Birkmeyer, Andrea E. Siewers, Emily Finlayson et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2002 · 5K citations
Medicine, Surgery, General Surgery +15
Impact of Hospital Volume on Operative Mortality for Major Cancer Surgery
Colin B. Begg · JAMA · 1998 · 1.7K citations