International Archives of Allergy and Immunology · 2005 · 36 citations · 5 references
Life SciencesImmunologyPediatricsAllergyHypersensitivityImmunotherapyAllergen ImmunotherapyAllergic RhinitisAllergy PharmacotherapyIge-mediated AllergyAllergic Rhinitis ImmunotherapyImmunotherapy For Allergic DiseaseInhalant Allergen ExposurePediatric Allergic Rhinitis PharmacotherapyPediatric Allergy PharmacotherapyRush ImmunotherapySublingual Allergen ImmunotherapySystemic Adverse Reactions
BACKGROUND: The safety and tolerability of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been documented in allergic patients both in the build-up phase as well as during maintenance, but only two studies have evaluated the occurrence of adverse reactions with an ultra-rush regimen of SLIT induction in a mixed paediatric/adult population. Moreover one of these two studies used a chemically modified extract (allergoid). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the occurrence of immediate or late adverse reactions in allergic children after a very fast (40 min) ultra-rush SLIT induction with two different allergen extract solutions. METHODS: We studied 100 children (64 boys, mean age of 9.6 years, range 3.5-16.8), with a history of intermittent/persistent rhinitis and/or intermittent/mild persistent asthma due to inhalant allergens. The ultra-rush build-up phase involved the administration, every 10 min, of increasing doses of the highest-concentration vial of SLIT of two different manufacturers (Anallergo and Stallergènes). RESULTS: All patients completed the treatment, side-effects have been recorded in 19% of the cases: 10% within 1 h after the build-up phase, 7% within 48 h and 2% mixed. A major difference (p = 0.0001) was recorded between Anallergo (6 patients, 8.7%) and Staloral (13 patients, 41.9%), but all the reactions were mild: principally oral symptoms, in 1 case rhinorrhoea and cough, and delayed abdominal pain and diarrhoea in another patient. CONCLUSIONS: No severe adverse reactions were observed with this ultra-rush SLIT induction also in the paediatric age; statistical differences have been documented between the two different extracts.
5
Safety of Sublingual-Swallow Immunotherapy in Children and Adults
C. André, C. Vatrinet, Sylvie Galvain et al. · International Archives of Allergy and Immunology · 2000 · 160 citations
Safety of sublingual immunotherapy with a monomeric allergoid in very young children
Fabio Agostinis, L. Tellarini, Giorgio Walter Canonica et al. · Allergy · 2004 · 117 citations · Full text
R. E. Rossi, G. Monasterolo · International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology · 2005 · 45 citations