Attraction of <i>Culicoides brevitarsis</i> Kieffer (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) and <i>Culex annulirostris</i> Skuse (Diptera: Culicidae) to simulated visual and chemical stimuli from cattle

Abstract

Abstract Different host‐seeking responses to cattle by Culicoides brevitarsis and Culex annulirostris were found using two‐dimensional cattle‐shapes and simulated stimuli. Culicoides brevitarsis was attracted to the respiratory chemicals CO 2 and CO 2 + octenol but not to octenol alone. It was attracted to cattle‐shape when CO 2 + octenol was also present and when the shape was enhanced with visible and infrared light. Culex annulirostris was attracted to each chemical treatment but not to any visual stimuli. Orientation of the host, possibly in relation to wind direction, may also be important but requires further consideration. The detection of behavioural differences between the species was dependent on the positioning of attractants and traps in relation to the host image. Responses by C. brevitarsis to CO 2 + octenol and the basic shape were only recorded in sticky traps. Contact with the shape was recorded initially on the shape head but preference was shown later to be for the ridge‐line of the back. The response by Cx. annulirostris to CO 2 + octenol was only recorded in light traps placed centrally and above the shape. It is proposed that the initial location of hosts by C. brevitarsis is by visual stimuli. Attraction to CO 2 + octenol is secondary and probably only occurs close to the host. The chemicals help the midge to recognise and come to the potential host where landing is induced visually near the interface between the backline of the host and the background. The primary response by Cx. annulirostris is to CO 2 and octenol although these did not appear to bring this insect on to the host. Covers could be used to protect cattle from C. brevitarsis (but not Cx. annulirostris ) by blocking the visual stimuli.