Publication | Closed Access
Syntheses, Structures and Magnetic Properties of Trinuclear Cu<sup>II</sup>M<sup>II</sup>Cu<sup>II</sup> (M = Cu, Ni, Co and Fe) and Tetranuclear [2×1+1×2] Cu<sup>II</sup>Mn<sup>II</sup>–2Cu<sup>II</sup> Complexes Derived from a Compartmental Ligand: The Schiff Base 3‐Methoxysalicylaldehyde Diamine Can also Stabilize a Cocrystal
39
Citations
44
References
2010
Year
Materials ScienceInorganic ChemistryMagnetic PropertiesChemical EngineeringEngineeringDiamine CanCoordination ComplexCompartmental LigandClo 4Molecular ComplexChemistryCuo 6Inorganic SynthesisCompound 2Inorganic Compound
Abstract The present investigation describes syntheses, characterization and studies of the mononuclear compound [Cu II L⊂(H 2 O)] ( 1 ), the triangular, trinuclear monophenoxido‐bridged compounds [{Cu II L} 2 M II (H 2 O) 2 ](ClO 4 ) 2 · n H 2 O [ 2 (M = Cu, n = 0), 3 (M = Ni, n = 3), 4 (M = Co, n = 0), 5 (M = Fe, n = 0)] and the tetrametallic self‐assembled complex [{Cu II LMn II (H 2 O) 3 }{Cu II L} 2 ](ClO 4 ) 2 · H 2 O ( 6 ) derived from compartmental Schiff base ligand, H 2 L, which is the [2+1] condensation product of 3‐methoxysalicylaldehyde and trans ‐1,2‐diaminocyclohexane. Single‐crystal X‐ray structures of 2 , 5 and 6 were determined. Two pairs of terminal ··· central metal ions in the trinuclear cores in 2 and 5 are monophenoxido‐bridged. Interestingly, the CuO 6 and FeO 6 environments have tetragonally compressed octahedral geometries. On the other hand, the structure of 6 reveals that it is a [2×1+1×2] cocrystal of one diphenoxido‐bridged dinuclear [Cu II LMn II (H 2 O) 3 ] 2+ dication and two mononuclear [Cu II L] moieties. Cocrystallization in 6 takes place as a result of water encapsulation. The variable‐temperature (2–300 K) magnetic susceptibilities of compounds 2 – 6 have been measured. The exchange integrals obtained are: the Cu II 3 compound 2 , J = –78.9 cm –1 ; the Cu II Ni II Cu II compound 3 , J = –22.8 cm –1 ; the Cu II Co II Cu II compound 4 , J = –7.8 cm –1 ; the Cu II Fe II Cu II compound 5 , J = –3.0 cm –1 ; the Cu II 3 Mn II compound 6 , J = –15.1 cm –1 . The monophenoxido‐bridging core in 3 and 4 has been proposed after comparison of the structures and magnetic properties of these two compounds with those of 2 , 5 and related other compounds. This paper presents rare examples of monophenoxido‐bridged Cu II M II Cu II (M = Cu, Ni, Co and Fe) compounds, provides an understanding of the structures from magnetic exchange integrals, and, most importantly, reports on the first example of a cocrystal derived from a 3‐methoxysalicylaldehyde diamine compartmental ligand.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1