Concepedia

TLDR

The theory enables pre‑project estimation of the execution time required to reach a target mean time to failure, which can be mapped to calendar time for scheduling. By applying maximum‑likelihood estimation to failure intervals, the model continually updates remaining execution and calendar time, current MTTF, and error counts, and a program computes these metrics. The resulting estimates aid testing schedule monitoring, support system trade‑offs, provide a basis for comparing programming techniques, and have been validated on four medium‑sized projects.

Abstract

The theory permits the estimation, in advance of a project, of the amount of testing in terms of execution time required to achieve a specified reliability goal [stated as a mean time to failure (MTTF)]. Execution time can then be related to calendar time, permitting a schedule to be developed. Estimates of execution time and calendar time remaining until the reliability goal is attained can be continually remade as testing proceeds, based only on the length of the execution time intervals between failures. The current MTTF and the number of errors remaining can also be estimated. Maximum likelihood estimation is employed, and confidence intervals are also established. The foregoing information is obviously very valuable in scheduling and monitoring the progress of program testing. A program has been implemented to compute the foregoing quantities. The reliability model that has been developed can be used in making system tradeoffs involving software or software and hardware components. It also provides a soundly based unit of measure for the comparative evaluation of various programming techniques that are expected to enhance reliability. The model has been applied to four medium-sized software development projects, all of which have completed their life cycles.