Optimism, Social Support, and Coping Strategies As Factors Contributing to Posttraumatic Growth: A Meta-Analysis

Gabriele Prati, Luca Pietrantoni

Journal of Loss and Trauma · 2009 · 970 citations · 117 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The meta‑analysis investigates how optimism, social support, and coping strategies contribute to posttraumatic growth. It aggregates data from 103 studies to evaluate effect sizes of these variables. The analysis found significant positive effects for all three systems, with religious and positive reappraisal coping showing the largest effects, social support, seeking support, spirituality, and optimism showing moderate effects, acceptance coping the smallest, and moderators such as age, gender, study design, and time since trauma not altering overall patterns.

Abstract

This meta-analytic review examines the role of optimism, social support, and coping strategies in contributing to posttraumatic growth. Results from 103 studies showed that all three systems of variables yielded significant effect sizes. Religious coping and positive reappraisal coping produced the largest effect sizes. Social support, seeking social support coping, spirituality, and optimism were moderately related to posttraumatic growth. Acceptance coping yielded the smallest effect sizes. Moderator analyses showed that effect sizes did not differ according to time elapsed since trauma, gender, and type of posttraumatic growth measure (posttraumatic growth vs. benefit finding). Age and gender were significant moderators of religious coping, whereas study design (longitudinal vs. cross-sectional) significantly moderated the effect of positive reappraisal coping. Implications for research and interventions on posttraumatic growth are also discussed.

References

117