Consistency of histopathological reporting of laryngeal dysplasia

Abstract

Our group had a satisfactory agreement on the distinction of mild from severe dysplasia and on microinvasive carcinoma without any discussion as to histopathological criteria to be used. Clinical management--review endoscopy, repeat cord stripping, radiotherapy and laryngectomy--is in general dependent on histological assessment. Thus the agreement on categories which underpin clinical management is reassuring. However, assessment of moderate dysplasia remains problematic. An attempt to utilize a two grade system--low grade from high grade dysplasia/CIS--may have merit. The implications of the terminology used must be agreed among pathologists and clinicians working closely within clinicopathological cancer groups.