Technological innovation in PPPs: incentives, opportunities and actions

Roine Leiringer

Construction Management and Economics · 2006 · 146 citations · 19 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Public‑Private Partnership projects are credited with creating incentives for actors and fostering a business environment conducive to innovation and improved construction practices. The study examines the validity of four rhetorical arguments for PPPs—collaborative working, design freedom, long‑term commitment, and risk transfer—and investigates how these intentions align with actual opportunities for technological innovation during design and construction. The authors analyze the four arguments and assess the correspondence between stated intentions and experienced realities, evaluating whether actors in design and construction phases can exploit technological innovation opportunities. The authors caution that the purported benefits of PPPs should be reconsidered, argue that the common arguments need revision, and present alternative interpretations.

Abstract

From a construction perspective, Public‐Private Partnership projects (PPPs) are often credited as providing real incentives for the actors involved as well as a business environment that is conducive to innovation and improved practices. The validity of four common rhetorical arguments used to promote the PPP procurement route is explored: collaborative working, design freedom, long‐term commitment and risk transfer. Particular interest is given to the extent to which espoused intentions correlate with experienced realities in allowing actors involved in the design and construction phases to be presented with, and able to exploit, opportunities for technological innovation. It is argued that there is reason to be cautious in fully accepting the purported benefits of the PPP framework and that the arguments often presented need to be revised. Alternative interpretations are provided.

References

19