The Journal of Urology · 1996 · 118 citations · 33 references
Fetal MedicineGynecologySurgeryReconstructive UrologyPosterior Urethral ValvesUrogenital RadiologyGeriatric UrologyPediatric SurgeryClinical OutcomesUrogynecologyCardiothoracic SurgeryInfertilityUrological ResearchFetal TherapyOutcomes ResearchNewborn MedicineUrethral AtresiaUrologyPatient SafetyFetal ComplicationMedicine
No AccessJournal of UrologyObstructive Uropathy/Imaging1 Aug 1996Fetal Therapy for Obstructive Uropathy: Specific Outcomes Diagnosis Andrew L. Freedman, Timothy P. Bukowski, Craig A. Smith, Mark I. Evans, Mark Paul Johnson, and Ricardo Gonzalez Andrew L. FreedmanAndrew L. Freedman , Timothy P. BukowskiTimothy P. Bukowski , Craig A. SmithCraig A. Smith , Mark I. EvansMark I. Evans , Mark Paul JohnsonMark Paul Johnson , and Ricardo GonzalezRicardo Gonzalez View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65795-1AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: Attempts to evaluate prenatal vesico-amniotic shunt therapy have been hampered by inconsistencies in patient selection, treatment and termination criteria, and outcomes measurement. Outcomes have generally been measured against those of patients with postnatally detected posterior urethral valves. The purpose of this report was to evaluate the influence of the underlying diagnosis on the clinical outcomes of fetuses undergoing evaluation for prenatal intervention for suspected obstructive uropathy. Furthermore, specific outcomes diagnosis was compared to the published natural history of these disorders to begin to establish a basis for measuring the efficacy of prenatal intervention. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 55 consecutive patients undergoing prenatal evaluation using structured outcome measures stratified by specific diagnoses to provide a comparison to the reported natural history for each underlying disorder. Results: All fetuses had early onset of oligohydramnios/anhydramnios representing the worst end of the spectrum. Compared to postnatally diagnosed patients, prenatally diagnosed patients with posterior urethral valves had lower survival (60 versus 93 percent) but similar postnatal renal failure rates (31 versus 33 percent). Cases of prenatally detected but untreated posterior urethral valves had a 44 percent renal failure rate. In fetuses with the prune-belly sundrome survival (86 versus 72 percent) and renal function rates (17 versus 27 percent renal failure) compared favorably with the postnatal experience, although 55 percent of the cases had significant urethral obstruction. All patients with urethral atresia died. Conclusions: The underlying etiology of obstruction appears to have a marked influence on clinical outcome independently of treatment. When evaluated by specific diagnosis, intervention appears to provide outcomes in these high risk fetuses that are comparable to those for disease detected postnatally. Interpretation of series that do not distinguish cases by onset, severity and specific pathological process is problematic. Greater standardization of patient selection, treatment and outcome measurement, including the use of specific diagnoses, is necessary to allow an accurate assessment of the efficacy and proper role of fetal therapy. References 1 : Sequential invasive assessment of fetal renal function and the intrauterine treatment of fetal obstructive uropathies. Obst. Gynec.1991; 77: 545. Google Scholar 2 : In utero surgical treatment of fetal obstructive uropathy: a new comprehensive approach to identify appropriate candidates for vesicoamniotic shunt therapy. Amer. J. Obst. Gynec.1994; 170: 1770. Google Scholar 3 : Catheter shunts for fetal hydronephrosis and hydrocephalus. Report of the International Fetal Surgery Registry. New Engl. J. Med.1986; 315: 336. Google Scholar 4 : Intervention for fetal obstructive uropathy: has it been effective?. Lancet1987; 2: 1007. Google Scholar 5 : Prognosis of posterior urethral valves presenting at birth. J. Ped. Surg.1986; 21: 43. Google Scholar 6 : Posterior urethral valves. Brit. J. Urol.1994; 74: 134. Google Scholar 7 : Second trimester oligohydramnios, a predictor of poor fetal outcome. Obst. Gynec.1984; 64: 608. Google Scholar 8 : Fetal outcome with oligohydramnios in the second trimester. Obst. Gynec.1986; 67: 840. Google Scholar 9 : Prenatally detected posterior urethral valves: is gestational age at detection a predictor of outcome?. J. Urol., part 21994; 152: 698. Abstract, Google Scholar 10 : Prognosis for patients with prenatally diagnosed posterior urethral valves. J. Urol.1992; 148: 125. Link, Google Scholar 11 : Evaluation of fetal renal function: unreliability of fetal urinary electrolytes. J. Urol., part 21990; 144: 574. Abstract, Google Scholar 12 : Fetal urinary biochemistry predicts postnatal renal function in children with bilateral obstructive uropathies. Obst. Gynec.1993; 82: 813. Google Scholar 13 : Prune belly syndrome: 35 years of experience. J. Urol.1987; 137: 86. Link, Google Scholar 14 : Long-term urinary continance and renal function in neonates with posterior urethral valves. J. Urol.1990; 144: 1209. Link, Google Scholar 15 : Fetal intervention in obstructive uropathy: prognostic indicators and efficacy of intervention. Amer. J. Obst. Gynec.1990; 162: 1239. Google Scholar 16 : Antenatal diagnosis of posterior urethral valves. Brit. J. Urol.1993; 72: 364. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 17 : Posterior urethral valves. Does prenatal diagnosis influence prognosis. Brit. J. Urol.1993; 72: 830. Google Scholar 18 : Fetal urine analysis for the assessment of renal function in obstructive uropathy. Amer. J. Obst. Gynec.1993; 168: 174. Google Scholar 19 : Prenatal prediction of renal function in fetal obstructive uropathies. J. Perinat. Med.1991; 19: 283. Google Scholar 20 : Radiographic and serologic correlates of azotemia in patients with posterior urethral valves. J. Urol.1992; 148: 1499. Link, Google Scholar 21 : Fetal urine biochemistry in the assessment of obstructive uropathy. Amer. J. Obst. Gynec.1992; 166: 932. Google Scholar 22 : Long-term outcome of boys with posterior urethral valves. Brit. J. Urol.1988; 62: 59. Google Scholar 23 : Development of renal failure in children with the prune belly syndrome. J. Urol.1991; 145: 1017. Link, Google Scholar 24 : Influence of initial therapy on progression of renal failure and body growth in children with posterior urethral valves. J. Urol., part 21992; 148: 532. Abstract, Google Scholar 25 : Urethral atresia and the prune belly syndrome. Report of 6 cases. Brit. J. Urol.1993; 72: 112. Google Scholar 26 : Non-invasive management of fetal obstructive uropathy. Lancet1988; 2: 949. Google Scholar 27 : Management of congenital posterior urethral valves. Brit. J. Urol.1985; 57: 71. Google Scholar 28 : Predictors of eventual end stage renal disease in children with posterior urethral valves. J. Urol.1986; 136: 857. Link, Google Scholar 29 : The management of posterior urethral valves by initial vesicostomy and delayed valve ablation. J. Urol.1990; 144: 1212. Link, Google Scholar 30 : Prognostic features in infants with obstructive uropathy due to posterior urethral valves. J. Urol.1985; 133: 240. Link, Google Scholar 31 : Prune belly syndrome--report of 47 cases. Arch. Dis. Child.1982; 57: 856. Google Scholar 32 : The prune belly syndrome. Report of 20 cases and description of a lethal variant. J. Ped.1973; 83: 786. Google Scholar 33 : The nonpredictive value of fetal urinary electrolytes: preliminary report of outcomes and correlations with pathological diagnosis. Amer. J. Obst. Gynec.1987; 157: 694. Google Scholar 34 : Long-term survival in an infant with urethral atresia. J. Urol.1990; 143: 336. Link, Google Scholar From the Department of Pediatric Urology, Children's Hospital of Michigan and Center for Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Molecular Medicine and Genetics and Pathology, Hutzel Hospital, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.© 1996 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byAcar Ö, Uluocak N, Ziylan O, Kalelioğlu İ, Yüksel A and Ander H (2009) Is Cystatin C a Promising Parameter to Determine Postnatal Outcome of Prenatally Diagnosed Infravesical Obstruction?Journal of Urology, VOL. 182, NO. 4, (1542-1547), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2009.HOFMANN R, BECKER T, MEYER-WITTKOPF M, TEKESIN I, SIERRA F and SCHMIDT S (2018) Fetoscopic Placement of a Transurethral Stent for Intrauterine Obstructive UropathyJournal of Urology, VOL. 171, NO. 1, (384-386), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2004.Herndon C and Casale A (2018) Early Second Trimester Intervention In A Surviving Infant With Postnatally Diagnosed Urethral AtresiaJournal of Urology, VOL. 168, NO. 4 Part 1, (1532-1533), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2002.McLORIE G, FARHAT W, KHOURY A, GEARY D and RYAN G (2018) OUTCOME ANALYSIS OF VESICOAMNIOTIC SHUNTING IN A COMPREHENSIVE POPULATIONJournal of Urology, VOL. 166, NO. 3, (1036-1040), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2001.GONZÁLEZ R, De FILIPPO R, JEDNAK R and BARTHOLD J (2018) URETHRAL ATRESIA: LONG-TERM OUTCOME IN 6 CHILDREN WHO SURVIVED THE NEONATAL PERIODJournal of Urology, VOL. 165, NO. 6 Part 2, (2241-2244), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2001.HERNDON C, FERRER F, FREEDMAN A and McKENNA P (2018) CONSENSUS ON THE PRENATAL MANAGEMENT OF ANTENATALLY DETECTED UROLOGICAL ABNORMALITIESJournal of Urology, VOL. 164, NO. 3 Part 2, (1052-1056), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2000.EL-GHONEIMI A, DESGRIPPES A, LUTON D, MACHER M, GUIBOURDENCHE J, GAREL C, MULLER F, VUILLARD E, LOTTMANN H, NESSMANN C, OURY J and AIGRAIN Y (2018) OUTCOME OF POSTERIOR URETHRAL VALVES: TO WHAT EXTENT IS IT IMPROVED BY PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS?Journal of Urology, VOL. 162, NO. 3 Part 1, (849-853), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1999.FEITZ W, STEEGERS E, de GIER R, AARNINK R, THEO A and van der WILDT B (2018) FEASIBILITY OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE INTRAUTERINE FETAL ACCESS IN A MONKEY MODELJournal of Urology, VOL. 161, NO. 1, (281-285), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1999.BROCK J, HUNLEY T, ADAMS M and KON V (2018) ROLE OF THE RENIN-ANGIOTENSIN SYSTEM IN DISORDERS OF THE URINARY TRACTJournal of Urology, VOL. 160, NO. 5, (1812-1819), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1998.Hutton K, Thomas D and Davies B (2018) Prenatally Detected Posterior Urethral Valves: Qualitative Assessment of Second Trimester Scans and Prediction of OutcomeJournal of Urology, VOL. 158, NO. 3, (1022-1025), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1997.Coplen D (2018) Prenatal Intervention for HydronephrosisJournal of Urology, VOL. 157, NO. 6, (2270-2277), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1997.Greenfield S (2018) Editorial: Posterior Urethral Valves-New ConceptsJournal of Urology, VOL. 157, NO. 3, (996-997), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1997. Volume 156Issue 2SAugust 1996Page: 720-724 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1996 by American Urological Association, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Andrew L. Freedman More articles by this author Timothy P. Bukowski More articles by this author Craig A. Smith More articles by this author Mark I. Evans More articles by this author Mark Paul Johnson More articles by this author Ricardo Gonzalez More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
33
Long‐term Outcome of Boys with Posterior Urethral Valves
Helen F. Parkhouse, T M Barratt, M J Dillon et al. · British Journal of Urology · 1988 · 360 citations
Mark P. Johnson, Timothy P. Bukowski, Claude Reitleman et al. · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · 1994 · 196 citations