Journal of Breast Cancer · 2012 · 66 citations · 18 references
MedicineOncologyRadiologyBreast OncologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyBreast Cancer ImagingBreast ImagingComputed TomographyPositron Emission TomographyTumor Imaging18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission TomographyDistant Metastasis DetectionDistant Metastasis StagingFluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission TomographyMammary Tumor ImagingPet-computed TomographyPositron Emission Tomography DetectionPreoperative Cancer Imaging
PURPOSE: There have been recent studies of the (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) in the staging, detection, and follow-up of the breast cancer occurrence and recurrence. There was controversy concerning the use of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for staging primary breast cancer. In this study, we investigated the potential effects of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the initial assessment of patients with primary breast cancer. METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2009, 154 consecutive biopsy-proven invasive breast cancer patients were enrolled in this study. Patients underwent conventional imaging studies including mammography, breast ultrasonography (USG), and magnetic resonance imaging for local assessment, and plain chest X-ray, liver USG, and bone scan to rule out distant metastasis. All 154 patients underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the initial assessment. RESULTS: (18)F-FDG PET/CT did not detect primary breast lesions in 16 patients with a sensitivity of 89.6% and detected only 5 multiple lesions (12.5%) out of 40 cases. Histologically confirmed axillary lymph node (LN) metastases were in 51 patients, and the sensitivity and specificity of (18)F-FDG PET/CT to detect metastatic axilla were 37.3% and 95.8%, respectively; whereas the corresponding estimates of USG were 41.2% and 93.7%, respectively. Eleven extra-axillary LN metastases were found in eight patients, and seven lesions were detected by (18)F-FDG PET/CT only. The sensitivity and specificity of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in detecting distant metastasis were 100% and 96.4%, respectively; whereas the sensitivity and specificity of the conventional imaging were 61.5% and 99.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET/CT cannot be recommended as a primary diagnostic procedure in breast cancer, but it has the potential to be used as an additional imaging tool for the detection of axillary metastasis, distant metastasis, and extra-axillary LN metastasis. (18)F-FDG PET/CT cannot solely replace the conventional diagnostic procedure in primary breast cancer. The best approach may be the combination of different imaging modalities.
18
David Fuster, Joan Duch, Pilar Paredes et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2008 · 275 citations · Full text