Relationship between maximum acceptable work time and physical workload

Hsin‐Chieh Wu, Mao‐Jiun J. Wang

Ergonomics · 2002 · 189 citations · 17 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Safe job design requires knowing the maximum acceptable work time for a given workload. The study aimed to determine how maximum acceptable work time relates to physical workload. Twelve young adults performed cycling tests at six work rates relative to their maximum capacity, during which VO₂, heart rate, and relative oxygen uptake were recorded to determine MAWT from heart‑rate data. MAWT was negatively correlated with %VO₂max, heart rate, and relative oxygen uptake (p < 0.01), and three exponential regression models (R² > 0.80) indicated that shifts longer than 10 h should use lower intensity, while a 4‑h shift could allow about 10 % higher VO₂max than an 8‑h shift.

Abstract

For safe job design, it is necessary to know the maximum acceptable work time (MAWT) for a given workload. The aim was to establish the relationship between MAWT and physical workload. Cycling tests at six different work rates relative to personal maximum working capacity were performed by 12 young adults in the laboratory. The oxygen uptake (VO(2)) in the per cent maximum aerobic capacity (%VO(2max)), relative heart rate (RHR) and relative oxygen uptake (RVO(2)) were collected throughout the test. MAWT was determined by observing the heart rate data during the test. The results showed that MAWT was negatively correlated with %VO(2max), RHR and RVO(2) (p < 0.01). Three exponential regression models were obtained and all their R(2) > 0.80. These models suggest that long-hour shifts (> 10 h) should assign a lower work intensity than for an 8-h workday. It is also logical that the workload limit for a 4-h work shift could be set at about 10% VO(2max) higher than the suggested limit for an 8-h workday.

References

17