Expenditure Incidence in Africa: Microeconomic Evidence

David E. Sahn, Stephen D. Younger

Fiscal Studies · 2000 · 115 citations · 11 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study examines the progressivity of social sector expenditures in eight sub‑Saharan African countries. Dominance tests and extended Gini/concentration coefficients are used to assess whether health and education spending redistributes resources to the poor. The analysis shows that social services are poorly targeted, with primary education most progressive, university education least progressive, and hospital care benefits less progressive than other health facilities, and that while concentration curves summarize distributional benefits, statistical testing of curve differences is essential.

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we examine the progressivity of social sector expenditures in eight sub‐Saharan African countries. We employ dominance tests, complemented by extended Gini/concentration coefficients, to determine whether health and education expenditures redistribute resources to the poor. We find that social services are poorly targeted. Among the services examined, primary education tends to be most progressive and university education is least progressive. The benefits associated with hospital care are also less progressive than other health facilities. Our results also show that, while concentration curves are a useful way to summarise information on the distributional benefits of government expenditures, statistical testing of differences in curves is important.

References

11