Publication | Closed Access
The developmental roots of fairness: infants’ reactions to equal and unequal distributions of resources
521
Citations
40
References
2011
Year
Behavioral Decision MakingSocial PsychologyDiscriminationEducationNegative ReactionsPsychologySocial SciencesDevelopmental PsychologyBiasSocial ReasoningSocial-emotional DevelopmentSocial Learning TheoryAvailable ResourcesSocial InequalityChild PsychologyBehavioral SciencesCognitive ScienceSocial Evaluation SkillsEarly Childhood DevelopmentEqual OpportunityAltruismDisparate ImpactFairness (Language Acquisition)Unequal DistributionsFair DivisionSocial CognitionChild DevelopmentProsocial BehaviorSocial BehaviorDevelopmental RootsSociologyDevelopmental ScienceInjustice
Distributing resources is central to social life, and adults, as well as non‑human primates and dogs, react negatively to inequitable distributions. The study involved two experiments measuring infants’ reactions to equal and unequal resource distributions. The experiments used infants’ looking times and manual choices to assess how they evaluate distributive actions and reason about agents’ dispositions. The results showed that 12‑ to 18‑month‑old infants use these measures to evaluate fairness, supporting theories of early social evaluation and fairness.
The problem of how to distribute available resources among members of a group is a central aspect of social life. Adults react negatively to inequitable distributions and several studies have reported negative reactions to inequity also in non-human primates and dogs. We report two experiments on infants' reactions to equal and unequal distributions. In two experiments, infants' looking times and manual choices provide, for the first time, converging evidence suggesting that infants aged 12 to 18 months (mean age 16 months) attend to the outcomes of distributive actions to evaluate agents' actions and to reason about agents' dispositions. The results provide support for recent theoretical proposals on the developmental roots of social evaluation skills and a sense of fairness.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1