Publication | Open Access
The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life.
611
Citations
17
References
1993
Year
Quality Of LifeFemoral Head ProsthesesHealth OutcomeHealth-related QualityNon-operative ManagementOsteoporosisOrthopaedic SurgeryChronic Musculoskeletal ConditionOsteoarthritisOrthopaedicsJoint ReplacementHealth SciencesOutcomes ResearchRehabilitationPhysical TherapyToronto ArthritisHealth EconomicsHip ArthroplastyTotal Hip ReplacementMedicine
The study examined the impact of total hip replacement on health‑related quality of life in osteoarthritis patients within a randomized controlled trial comparing cemented versus uncemented femoral head prostheses. Eighteen‑eight patients were followed for up to two years, with health‑related quality of life assessed at multiple time points using the Harris hip score, Merle d'Aubigné score, Sickness Impact Profile, WOMAC, MACTAR, time‑trade‑off, and the six‑minute walk test. All quality‑of‑life measures and the six‑minute walk test improved significantly after surgery, with most gains evident by three months and only three of 188 patients missing follow‑up. Abstract truncated at 250 words.
The effect of total hip replacement on the health-related quality of life of patients who have osteoarthrosis was examined as part of a randomized, controlled trial comparing femoral head prostheses that were inserted with or without cement. One hundred and eighty-eight patients were followed for three months: 179 of them, for six months; 156, for one year; and ninety, for two years. The health-related quality of life was assessed with use of the Harris hip score, the Merle d'Aubigné hip score, the Sickness Impact Profile, the Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index, the McMaster--Toronto Arthritis (MACTAR) Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire, and the time trade-off technique as a measure of utility. Patients also took the six-minute-walk test. The mean age of the patients in the study was sixty-four years (range, forty to seventy-five years); ninety-seven patients (53 per cent) were men and ninety-four (50 per cent) had a prosthesis inserted with cement. Only three of 188 patients refused to return for quality-of-life assessments. There was significant improvement in all health-related quality-of-life measures and in the six-minute-walk test after the operation (p < 0.01 for all items, except for the work dimension of the Sickness Impact Profile at three months [p = 0.07]). Most of the improvement had occurred by three months postoperatively. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1