Journal of European Social Policy · 2000 · 151 citations · 21 references
Public AffairsEconomicsSocial PolicyEconomic DevelopmentSocial InsuranceWelfare PolicyEast Asian StudiesHistory Of WelfareModernization In AsiaSocial ProtectionSocial Welfare PolicyWelfare State PolicyComparative Welfare StatesPostwar Welfare ExpansionSocial Welfare RegimesWelfare State DevelopmentWelfare State ExpansionWelfare State GrowthWelfare State OriginsWelfare State Regimes
Western commentators have long assumed that East and Southeast Asia’s rapid economic growth occurred without developing social policies, and that such growth without welfare can be both possible and beneficial. This article investigates whether East and Southeast Asian countries delayed social insurance compared to European pioneers, whether their economic miracles involved forestalling welfare, and whether the 1997 financial crisis prompted reductions in social protection. The study finds that these Asian countries introduced social security at a lower modernization level than Western Europe, that rapid growth from 1985–95 was accompanied by welfare expansion, and that post‑1997 crisis trends still show increasing, not decreasing, state welfare responsibility.
It has long been assumed among Western commentators that rapid economic growth in East and South-east Asia has been achieved without the development of social policies. It has often been inferred that growth without social welfare is not only possible, but beneficial to further strong economic growth. The article questions these perceptions and beliefs. First, to what extent did East and South-east Asian countries delay the introduction of social insurance schemes compared to European pioneering countries, in the sense of introducing them only at a much higher level of 'modernization'? Second, to what extent was the economic miracle achieved by some of these countries based on (or accompanied by) attempts to forestall or retrench welfare state schemes? Third, to what extent has the recent financial crisis led to attempts at lowering or changing standards of social protection? The study shows that the Asian countries generally introduced social security programmes at a lower level of 'modernization' than Western European countries; that rapid and strong economic growth in the decade 1985–95 has in general been accompanied by welfare expansion; and that even after the financial crisis of 1997, expansion of state welfare responsibility is more evident than efforts to reduce or dismantle state welfare responsibility]
21
The three worlds of welfare capitalism
Choice Reviews Online · 1990 · 16.7K citations
Henry Hamilton, T. H. Marshall · British Journal of Sociology · 1951 · 4.1K citations
Humanities, History, Sociology +12
World Development Report 1990.
Michael P. Todaro, World Bank · Population and Development Review · 1990 · 1.8K citations
Duncan Mac Rae, Stein Rokkan · Social Forces · 1971 · 636 citations