Economic Inquiry · 2015 · 51 citations · 47 references
BusinessEconomicsFinanceAsset PricingFinancial EconomicsFinancial MarketsFinancial RiskFutures MarketsRisk AversionRisk PreferencesRisk-return AnalysisStochastic DominanceEquity Index FuturesRiskRisk SeekingStochastic Dominance AnalysisStochastic Dominance TestsStock Index Futures
This article considers four utility functions—concave, convex, S‐shaped, and reverse S‐shaped—to analyze the behavior of different types of investors on the Taiwan stock index and its corresponding index futures. Using stochastic dominance (SD) rules, we show that the existence of all four investor types is plausible. Risk averters prefer spot to futures, whereas risk seekers prefer futures to spot. Investors with S‐shaped utility functions prefer spot (futures) to futures (spot) when markets move upward (downward). Investors with reverse S‐shaped utility functions prefer futures (spot) to spot (futures) when markets move upward (downward). We show that both spot and futures markets can exist when only risk averters are present, but futures can dominate spot only if there is some risk‐seeking behavior. These results are robust with respect to subperiods, spot returns including dividends, and diversification. ( JEL C14, G12, G15)
47
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky · Econometrica · 1979 · 47K citations
Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects
Charles A. Holt, Susan K. Laury · American Economic Review · 2002 · 5.7K citations
Business, Economics, Psychology +17
The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk
Milton Friedman, Leonard J. Savage · Journal of Political Economy · 1948 · 3.1K citations