Contact Dermatitis · 2014 · 55 citations · 21 references
Life SciencesDermatologyImmunologyAllergyHypersensitivityOccupational DermatologyAllergen ExposureAllergic Skin DiseasesContact AllergyContact DermatitisPatch TestingContact Allergen IdentificationContact AllergenicityContact AllergensContact Allergy EpidemiologyPatch Test AllergensPatch Test Series SelectionRetrospective Case StudySensitization
BACKGROUND: The preservative methylisothiazolinone (MI) is used in combination with methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI), but the MCI/MI mixture has been identified as highly allergenic. MI is considered to be less allergenic, and since the mid-2000s has been widely used alone, but is now clearly identified as a contact allergen. The French Vigilance Network for Dermatology and Allergy of the Study and Research Group on Contact Dermatitis (REVIDAL-GERDA) added MI to its baseline patch testing series in 2010. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the change in the proportion of MI-positive tests in France between 2010 and 2012. PATIENTS/MATERIALS/METHODS: We conducted a nationwide, multicentre, retrospective study of all MI-tested patients between 2010 and 2012. RESULTS: Sixteen centres participated in the study (7874 patients were tested). Patch tests were performed mainly at a concentration of MI 200 ppm aq. We observed a significant increase in the proportion of MI-positive tests in 2012 and 2011 as compared with 2010 (5.6%, 3.3%, and 1.5%, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We report a significant increase in the number of MI-positive tests. MI is confirmed to be a rapidly emerging allergen, as also observed in other European countries.
21
Masprone · Archive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh) · 1979 · 199 citations · Full text
Contact allergy to preservatives. Analysis of IVDK data 1996-2009
Axel Schnuch, Holger Lessmann, Johannes Geier et al. · British Journal of Dermatology · 2011 · 164 citations
Life Sciences, Dermatology, Allergy +16