Work · 2002 · 58 citations · 9 references
MedicineKinesiologyRehabilitation MedicineFunctional AssessmentHuman PerformancePhysical TherapyCapacity AssessmentFunctional Capacity AssessmentFunctional Capacity EvaluationPhysical Performance AssessmentPhysical RehabilitationFunctional Capacity MeasurementInter-rater AgreementInter-rater ReliabilityInter-rater Reliability AssessmentReliability In Functional TestingSubjects
Functional capacity evaluations assess work‑related functional capacity, and while lifting and carrying are key components, the reliability of observational effort level determinations remains uncertain. The study aims to establish inter‑ and intra‑rater reliability of observational effort level determinations in functional capacity evaluations. The study used videotaped lifts and carries with progressive loads, which were randomly scrambled and reviewed twice by three physical therapists and two occupational therapists who assigned effort levels (light, medium, heavy, maximum) through standardized observations. Inter‑ and intra‑rater reliability of effort level observations ranged from 87–96 % and 93–97 %, respectively, demonstrating that therapists can reliably assess effort during lifting and carrying in healthy subjects.
To establish inter- and intra-rater reliability of observations in a functional capacity evaluation.Functional capacity evaluations are used to assess a person's functional capacity as it relates to work. Lifting and carrying are important aspects of a functional capacity evaluation. An evaluator determines the patient's levels of effort through standardized observations. Questions remain with regards to the reliability of these observations.Four healthy subjects were videotaped while performing two lifts and four carries with progressive loads. The videotape was scrambled randomly and viewed twice by 3 physical therapists and 2 occupational therapists. The evaluators determined the amount of effort it required (light, medium, heavy, and maximum). The inter- and intra-rater reliability of the observations was expressed by means of percentage agreement.Inter-rater reliability ranged 87-96%, intra-rater reliability ranged 93-97%.The results indicate that by means of standardized observations, therapists can reliably determine effort level during lifting and carrying in healthy subjects, and thus affirm the findings of other studies of similar design.
9
Reliability of work-related assessments
Ev Innes, Leon Straker · Work · 1999 · 161 citations
Social Sciences, Occupational Health Nursing, Functional Assessment +8
Nominal Scale Agreement Among Observers
Hubert J. A. Schouten · Psychometrika · 1986 · 88 citations